Comparison

Tranche de gigot vs Massaman Style Lamb Shanks

Overall, Tranche de gigot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Tranche de gigot	Massaman Style Lamb Shanks
Nutri-Score	b	c
NOVA group	1	—
Calories	128 kcal	198 kcal
Fat	6.2 g	11.6 g
Saturated fat	2.5 g	5.1 g
Sugars	0 g	1.8 g
Salt	0.2 g	0.2 g
Fiber	—	1.2 g
Protein	17.8 g	17.7 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Tranche de gigot has 35% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 198 kcal).
Tranche de gigot has 47% less fat (6.2 g vs 11.6 g).
Tranche de gigot has 51% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 5.1 g).
Tranche de gigot has no sugar, while Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 1.8 g.
Tranche de gigot has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tranche de gigot

Agneau

Massaman Style Lamb Shanks

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tranche de gigot or Massaman Style Lamb Shanks?

Overall, Tranche de gigot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tranche de gigot has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tranche de gigot has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Massaman Style Lamb Shan... vs Deluxe Tranche de gigot vs Deluxe Gigot agneau farci au be... vs Massaman Style Lamb Shan... 4 Tranches de gigot d’ag... vs Massaman Style Lamb Shan... Massaman Style Lamb Shan... vs Slow Cooked Lamb shank I... Gigot d'agneau à rôtir vs Massaman Style Lamb Shan... Gigot d’agneau*** vs Massaman Style Lamb Shan... Tranche de gigot vs Gigot agneau farci au be...