Gigot d'agneau à rôtir vs Massaman Style Lamb Shanks
Overall, Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gigot d'agneau à rôtir | Massaman Style Lamb Shanks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 128 kcal | 198 kcal |
| Fat | 5.1 g | 11.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 17.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has 35% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 198 kcal).
- Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has 56% less fat (5.1 g vs 11.6 g).
- Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has 63% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 5.1 g).
- Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has no sugar, while Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 1.8 g.
- Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has 12% more protein (20 g vs 17.7 g).
- Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Gigot d'agneau à rôtir
Agneau
Massaman Style Lamb Shanks
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gigot d'agneau à rôtir or Massaman Style Lamb Shanks?
Overall, Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.