Comparison

Gigot d'agneau à rôtir vs Massaman Style Lamb Shanks

Overall, Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGigot d'agneau à rôtirMassaman Style Lamb Shanks
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 128 kcal 198 kcal
Fat 5.1 g 11.6 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 5.1 g
Sugars 0 g 1.8 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber — 1.2 g
Protein 20 g 17.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has 35% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 198 kcal).
  • Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has 56% less fat (5.1 g vs 11.6 g).
  • Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has 63% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has no sugar, while Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 1.8 g.
  • Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has 12% more protein (20 g vs 17.7 g).
  • Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Gigot d'agneau à rôtir

Agneau

Massaman Style Lamb Shanks

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gigot d'agneau à rôtir or Massaman Style Lamb Shanks?

Overall, Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gigot d'agneau à rôtir has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons