Gigot agneau farci au beurre vs Massaman Style Lamb Shanks
Overall, Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gigot agneau farci au beurre | Massaman Style Lamb Shanks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 218 kcal | 198 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 11.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.4 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 17.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 28% less fat (11.6 g vs 16 g).
- Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 31% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 7.4 g).
- Gigot agneau farci au beurre has 72% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Only Gigot agneau farci au beurre lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Gigot agneau farci au beurre
Viande d'agneau (origine : hors UE), beurre composé 6% (beurre (contient du lait) 4,9%, oignon 0,4%, persil 0,4%, ail 0,2%, sel, cerfeuil, ciboulette, estragon, acidifiant: acide citrique, poivre blanc).
Massaman Style Lamb Shanks
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gigot agneau farci au beurre or Massaman Style Lamb Shanks?
Overall, Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has fewer calories: 198 kcal versus 218 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gigot agneau farci au beurre has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.