4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau vs Massaman Style Lamb Shanks
Overall, 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau | Massaman Style Lamb Shanks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 128 kcal | 198 kcal |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 11.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 17.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has 35% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 198 kcal).
- 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has 46% less fat (6.3 g vs 11.6 g).
- 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has 49% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 5.1 g).
- 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has no sugar, while Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 1.8 g.
- Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 100% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0 g).
- 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau
Tranches de gigot d'agneau. Origine France.
Massaman Style Lamb Shanks
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau or Massaman Style Lamb Shanks?
Overall, 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.