Comparison

4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau vs Massaman Style Lamb Shanks

Overall, 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient4 Tranches de gigot d’agneauMassaman Style Lamb Shanks
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 128 kcal 198 kcal
Fat 6.3 g 11.6 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 5.1 g
Sugars 0 g 1.8 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 1.2 g
Protein 18 g 17.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has 35% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 198 kcal).
  • 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has 46% less fat (6.3 g vs 11.6 g).
  • 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has 49% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 5.1 g).
  • 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has no sugar, while Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 1.8 g.
  • Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 100% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0 g).
  • 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau

Tranches de gigot d'agneau. Origine France.

Massaman Style Lamb Shanks

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau or Massaman Style Lamb Shanks?

Overall, 4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

4 Tranches de gigot d’agneau has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons