Massaman Style Lamb Shanks vs Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mint Gravy
Overall, Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Massaman Style Lamb Shanks | Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 198 kcal | 218 kcal |
| Fat | 11.6 g | 11.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.1 g | 4.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 26.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 64% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 50% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mint Gravy has 33% more protein (26.4 g vs 17.7 g).
Ingredients
Massaman Style Lamb Shanks
Not available.
Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mint Gravy
lamb shank (80%), water, onion, sugar, spirit vinegar, cornflour, herbs (mint, parsley, thyme), tomato purée, caramelised sugar syrup, garlic purée, salt, carrot juice, lamb extract, lamb meat powder, lamb fat, preservative (potassium sorbate), dried onion, flavouring, antioxidant (rosemary extract)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Massaman Style Lamb Shanks or Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mint Gravy?
Overall, Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has fewer calories: 198 kcal versus 218 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mint Gravy has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.