Comparison

Gigot d’agneau*** vs Massaman Style Lamb Shanks

Overall, Gigot d’agneau*** has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGigot d’agneau***Massaman Style Lamb Shanks
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 157 kcal 198 kcal
Fat 9.6 g 11.6 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 5.1 g
Sugars 0 g 1.8 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 1.2 g
Protein 18 g 17.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gigot d’agneau*** has 21% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 198 kcal).
  • Gigot d’agneau*** has 17% less fat (9.6 g vs 11.6 g).
  • Gigot d’agneau*** has 49% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Gigot d’agneau*** has no sugar, while Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 1.8 g.
  • Massaman Style Lamb Shanks has 100% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0 g).
  • Gigot d’agneau*** has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Gigot d’agneau***

Agneau

Massaman Style Lamb Shanks

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gigot d’agneau*** or Massaman Style Lamb Shanks?

Overall, Gigot d’agneau*** has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gigot d’agneau*** has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gigot d’agneau*** has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons