Comparison

Tonijnstukken In Water vs Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje

Overall, Tonijnstukken In Water has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTonijnstukken In WaterOrtiz Tonijn borrelblikje
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 106 kcal 264 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 17.9 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 25 g 25.7 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tonijnstukken In Water has 60% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 264 kcal).
  • Tonijnstukken In Water has 96% less fat (0.7 g vs 17.9 g).
  • Tonijnstukken In Water has 93% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 3 g).
  • Tonijnstukken In Water has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Tonijnstukken In Water lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Tonijnstukken In Water

TONIJN (VIS), water, zout.

Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje

White tuna, olive oil, sea salt

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tonijnstukken In Water or Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje?

Overall, Tonijnstukken In Water has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tonijnstukken In Water has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tonijnstukken In Water has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons