Tonijnstukken In Water vs Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje
Overall, Tonijnstukken In Water has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tonijnstukken In Water | Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 106 kcal | 264 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 17.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 25.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tonijnstukken In Water has 60% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 264 kcal).
- Tonijnstukken In Water has 96% less fat (0.7 g vs 17.9 g).
- Tonijnstukken In Water has 93% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 3 g).
- Tonijnstukken In Water has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tonijnstukken In Water lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Tonijnstukken In Water
TONIJN (VIS), water, zout.
Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje
White tuna, olive oil, sea salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tonijnstukken In Water or Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje?
Overall, Tonijnstukken In Water has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tonijnstukken In Water has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tonijnstukken In Water has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.