Comparison

Tomates séchées 165g vs Anchois

Overall, Anchois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomates séchées 165gAnchois
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 159 kcal 198 kcal
Fat 12 g 12.5 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 2.1 g
Sugars 6 g 0.9 g
Salt 2.7 g 2 g
Fiber 5.9 g —
Protein 3.4 g 18.9 g
Additives22
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomates séchées 165g has 20% fewer calories (159 kcal vs 198 kcal).
  • Tomates séchées 165g has 38% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Anchois has 85% less sugar (0.9 g vs 6 g).
  • Anchois has 25% less salt (2 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Anchois has 82% more protein (18.9 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Only Tomates séchées 165g lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
  • Only Anchois lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Tomates séchées 165g

Tomates séchées 58,9%, huile de tournesol, sel, vinaigre de vin, ail, origan 0,35%, poivre noir 0,35%, acidifiant: acide lactique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique. Contient des SULFITES

Anchois

Filets d'_anchois_ avec peau marinés 55 % (filets d'_anchois_ avec peau (Engraulis encrasicolus), eau, vinaigre, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique), huiles végétales (colza, olive), tomates séchées, olives noires (olives noires, sel, eau, stabilisant : gluconate ferreux), ail 0,4 %, origan 0,1 %, herbes de Provence 0,03 % (romarin, thym, sarriette, basilic, marjolaine).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomates séchées 165g or Anchois?

Overall, Anchois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomates séchées 165g has fewer calories: 159 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Anchois has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons