Comparison

Tomaten vs Kookpakket Tikka Massala

Overall, Tomaten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomatenKookpakket Tikka Massala
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 31 kcal 113 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 3.7 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1.8 g
Sugars 4 g 1.6 g
Salt 0 g 0.5 g
Fiber — 1.3 g
Protein 0.9 g 5.1 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomaten has 72% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 113 kcal).
  • Tomaten has 78% less fat (0.8 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Tomaten has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Kookpakket Tikka Massala has 60% less sugar (1.6 g vs 4 g).
  • Tomaten has no salt, while Kookpakket Tikka Massala has 0.5 g.
  • Kookpakket Tikka Massala has 82% more protein (5.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Kookpakket Tikka Massala has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tomaten is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Tomaten

Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.00g per 100 gram EU Landbouw

Kookpakket Tikka Massala

Groente (27% ui, 16% tomaat, 16% aubergine, 8% rode paprika), water, kokosextract, tomatenpuree, specerijen, gember, zout, knoflook, plantaardige olie (raap, zonnebloem), citroenazijn, gemodificeerd aardappelzetmeel, stabilisator (xanthaangom [E415], emulgator (carrageen [E407]), verdikkingsmiddel (guarpitmeel [E412]), cichorei-extract, zuurteregelaar (melkzuur [E270]), extract van paprika.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomaten or Kookpakket Tikka Massala?

Overall, Tomaten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomaten has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 113 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kookpakket Tikka Massala has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons