Kookpakket Curry Madras vs Tomaten
Overall, Tomaten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kookpakket Curry Madras | Tomaten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 113 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomaten has 73% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 113 kcal).
- Tomaten has 78% less fat (0.8 g vs 3.6 g).
- Tomaten has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Kookpakket Curry Madras has 64% less sugar (1.4 g vs 4 g).
- Tomaten has no salt, while Kookpakket Curry Madras has 0.4 g.
- Kookpakket Curry Madras has 83% more protein (5.2 g vs 0.9 g).
- Tomaten is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kookpakket Curry Madras
Groente (21% bloemkool, 17% tomaat, 9,3% rode ui, 8,4% rode paprika, 7,5% winterpeen), water, 10% kokosextract, limoen, specerijen, azijn, zout, 0,5% rode chilipeper, knoflook, honing, natuurlijk aroma, extract van paprika, maïszetmeel, stabilisator (xanthaangom [E415]), verdikkingsmiddel (guarpitmeel [E412]), emulgator (carrageen [E407]), antiklontermiddel (natriumhexacyanoferraat(ii) [E535]).
Tomaten
Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.00g per 100 gram EU Landbouw
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kookpakket Curry Madras or Tomaten?
Overall, Tomaten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomaten has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 113 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kookpakket Curry Madras has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 4 g per 100 g.