Comparison

Tomaten vs Indiase wortelsoep

Overall, Tomaten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomatenIndiase wortelsoep
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 31 kcal 49 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 2.8 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1.5 g
Sugars 4 g 3 g
Salt 0 g 0.6 g
Fiber — 1.5 g
Protein 0.9 g 0.6 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomaten has 37% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 49 kcal).
  • Tomaten has 71% less fat (0.8 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Tomaten has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Indiase wortelsoep has 25% less sugar (3 g vs 4 g).
  • Tomaten has no salt, while Indiase wortelsoep has 0.6 g.
  • Tomaten has 33% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Tomaten is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Indiase wortelsoep lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Tomaten

Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.00g per 100 gram EU Landbouw

Indiase wortelsoep

Groente (33% winterpeen, 25% ui, 3,3% bleekselderij), zoete aardappel, kokosextract, water, limoen, zout, suiker, rode chilipeper, smaakversterker (mononatriumglutamaat [E621]), maltodextrine, specerijen (o.a. selderij), palmvet, 0,1% gedroogde groente (wortel, prei, selderij, tomaat, ui), rijstebloem, emulgator (carrageen [E407]), stabilisator (xanthaangom [E415]), verdikkingsmiddel (guarpitmeel [E412]), kruiden, aroma, kleurstof (ammoniakkaramel [E150c]).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomaten or Indiase wortelsoep?

Overall, Tomaten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomaten has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 49 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Indiase wortelsoep has less sugar: 3 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons