Comparison

Thon albacore vs Atún claro al natural

Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThon albacoreAtún claro al natural
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 4
Calories 190 kcal 77 kcal
Fat 9.6 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 1.1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 26 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Atún claro al natural has 59% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 190 kcal).
  • Atún claro al natural has 95% less fat (0.5 g vs 9.6 g).
  • Atún claro al natural has no saturated fat, while Thon albacore has 1.5 g.
  • Thon albacore has 31% more protein (26 g vs 18 g).
  • Only Atún claro al natural lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Thon albacore

Not available.

Atún claro al natural

Atún claro (pescado), agua, sal y aroma natural.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Thon albacore or Atún claro al natural?

Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Atún claro al natural has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Thon albacore has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons