Comparison

Atún claro al natural vs Atún claro al natural

Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAtún claro al naturalAtún claro al natural
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 4
Calories 114 kcal 77 kcal
Fat 1.4 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 25 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Atún claro al natural has 32% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 114 kcal).
  • Atún claro al natural has 64% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Atún claro al natural has no saturated fat, while Atún claro al natural has 0.3 g.
  • Atún claro al natural has 28% more protein (25 g vs 18 g).
  • Only Atún claro al natural lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Atún claro al natural

Not available.

Atún claro al natural

Atún claro (pescado), agua, sal y aroma natural.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Atún claro al natural or Atún claro al natural?

Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Atún claro al natural has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Atún claro al natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons