Thon albacore vs Atún claro al natural
Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thon albacore | Atún claro al natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 81 kcal |
| Fat | 9.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Atún claro al natural has 57% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 190 kcal).
- Atún claro al natural has 96% less fat (0.4 g vs 9.6 g).
- Atún claro al natural has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Thon albacore has 27% more protein (26 g vs 19 g).
- Only Atún claro al natural lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Thon albacore
Not available.
Atún claro al natural
Atún claro, agua, sal,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thon albacore or Atún claro al natural?
Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Atún claro al natural has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thon albacore has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.