Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable vs Atún claro al natural
Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable
Atún claro al natural
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thon albacore au naturel pêc... | Atún claro al natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 129 kcal | 81 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Atún claro al natural has 37% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 129 kcal).
- Atún claro al natural has 80% less fat (0.4 g vs 2 g).
- Atún claro al natural has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Atún claro al natural has no sugar, while Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable has 0.5 g.
- Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable has 30% more protein (27 g vs 19 g).
Ingredients
Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable
THON albacore 82%, eau, sel.
Atún claro al natural
Atún claro, agua, sal,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable or Atún claro al natural?
Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Atún claro al natural has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 129 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Atún claro al natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.