Thai Style Fishcakes vs Fischburger
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thai Style Fishcakes | Fischburger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 139 kcal | 132 kcal |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 8.7 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fischburger has 53% less fat (2.5 g vs 5.3 g).
- Fischburger has 76% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.7 g).
- Fischburger has 77% less sugar (2 g vs 8.7 g).
- Fischburger has 62% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.6 g).
- Fischburger has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Fischburger lists: Fish, Gluten.
Ingredients
Thai Style Fishcakes
Not available.
Fischburger
Alaska-Seelachs 60%, Weizenmehl, Wasser, Zwiebeln, Reismehl, Stärke, Petersilie, Kartoffel - flocken, Rapsöl, Speisesalz, Gewürze (Paprika, Pastinake, Lauchpulver, Liebstöckelwurzel, Bockshornklee - samen), Hefe, Sonnenblumenöl. Kann Spuren von Milch, Ei und Senf enthalten. Zubereitung Aufbe
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thai Style Fishcakes or Fischburger?
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fischburger has fewer calories: 132 kcal versus 139 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fischburger has less sugar: 2 g versus 8.7 g per 100 g.