Fischburger vs Hamburguesas merluza y gambón
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fischburger | Hamburguesas merluza y gambó... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 132 kcal | 143 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 7.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 11 g | 10.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fischburger has 66% less fat (2.5 g vs 7.3 g).
- Fischburger has 56% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Hamburguesas merluza y gambón has 70% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2 g).
- Fischburger has 39% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Fischburger has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Fischburger lists: Fish, Gluten.
Ingredients
Fischburger
Alaska-Seelachs 60%, Weizenmehl, Wasser, Zwiebeln, Reismehl, Stärke, Petersilie, Kartoffel - flocken, Rapsöl, Speisesalz, Gewürze (Paprika, Pastinake, Lauchpulver, Liebstöckelwurzel, Bockshornklee - samen), Hefe, Sonnenblumenöl. Kann Spuren von Milch, Ei und Senf enthalten. Zubereitung Aufbe
Hamburguesas merluza y gambón
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fischburger or Hamburguesas merluza y gambón?
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fischburger has fewer calories: 132 kcal versus 143 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburguesas merluza y gambón has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2 g per 100 g.