Fischburger vs Hamburguesas merluza y gambón
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fischburger | Hamburguesas merluza y gambó... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 151 kcal | 143 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 7.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 11.9 g | 10.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fischburger has 84% less fat (1.2 g vs 7.3 g).
- Fischburger has 67% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Hamburguesas merluza y gambón has 73% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Fischburger has 26% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Fischburger has 12% more protein (11.9 g vs 10.5 g).
- Only Fischburger lists: Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Fischburger
Fisch* 52 %, Weizenmehl, Wasser, Kartoffelflocken, Kräu - ter, Zwiebeln, Porree, Speisesalz, Gewürze (enthalten Senf), Branntweinessig, Laktose, Hefe, Zucker
Hamburguesas merluza y gambón
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fischburger or Hamburguesas merluza y gambón?
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburguesas merluza y gambón has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 151 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburguesas merluza y gambón has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.