Thai Style Fishcakes vs Fischburger
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thai Style Fishcakes | Fischburger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 139 kcal | 151 kcal |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 8.7 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 11.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fischburger has 77% less fat (1.2 g vs 5.3 g).
- Fischburger has 82% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Fischburger has 75% less sugar (2.2 g vs 8.7 g).
- Fischburger has 63% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.6 g).
- Fischburger has 16% more protein (11.9 g vs 10 g).
- Only Fischburger lists: Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Thai Style Fishcakes
Not available.
Fischburger
Fisch* 52 %, Weizenmehl, Wasser, Kartoffelflocken, Kräu - ter, Zwiebeln, Porree, Speisesalz, Gewürze (enthalten Senf), Branntweinessig, Laktose, Hefe, Zucker
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thai Style Fishcakes or Fischburger?
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Thai Style Fishcakes has fewer calories: 139 kcal versus 151 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fischburger has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 8.7 g per 100 g.