Fischburger vs Fischburger
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fischburger | Fischburger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 151 kcal | 132 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 11.9 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fischburger has 13% fewer calories (132 kcal vs 151 kcal).
- Fischburger has 52% less fat (1.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Fischburger has the better Nutri-Score.
- Fischburger is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Fischburger lists: Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Fischburger
Fisch* 52 %, Weizenmehl, Wasser, Kartoffelflocken, Kräu - ter, Zwiebeln, Porree, Speisesalz, Gewürze (enthalten Senf), Branntweinessig, Laktose, Hefe, Zucker
Fischburger
Alaska-Seelachs 60%, Weizenmehl, Wasser, Zwiebeln, Reismehl, Stärke, Petersilie, Kartoffel - flocken, Rapsöl, Speisesalz, Gewürze (Paprika, Pastinake, Lauchpulver, Liebstöckelwurzel, Bockshornklee - samen), Hefe, Sonnenblumenöl. Kann Spuren von Milch, Ei und Senf enthalten. Zubereitung Aufbe
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fischburger or Fischburger?
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fischburger has fewer calories: 132 kcal versus 151 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fischburger has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.