Tartines craquantes épeautre vs Wasa
Overall, Wasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tartines craquantes épeautre | Wasa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 373 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 20 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wasa has 25% less fat (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Tartines craquantes épeautre has 60% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2 g).
- Tartines craquantes épeautre has 44% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Wasa has 86% more fiber (20 g vs 2.8 g).
- Wasa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Wasa lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Tartines craquantes épeautre
Riz*, blé d’épeautre complet* 40g, levain de seigle déshydraté* (seigle*, blé*), sel.
Wasa
Farine complète de SEIGLE 110 g*, sel. *en g pour 100 g de produit. Peut contenir des traces de LUPIN, LAIT, MOUTARDE, GRAINES DE SÉSAME et SOJA.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tartines craquantes épeautre or Wasa?
Overall, Wasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wasa has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tartines craquantes épeautre has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.