Wasa vs Wasa Volkoren
Overall, Wasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wasa | Wasa Volkoren |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 338 kcal | 333 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 20 g | 20 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wasa has 90% less fat (1.5 g vs 15 g).
- Wasa Volkoren has 25% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Wasa Volkoren has 10% more protein (10 g vs 9 g).
- Wasa has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Wasa
Farine complète de SEIGLE 110 g*, sel. *en g pour 100 g de produit. Peut contenir des traces de LUPIN, LAIT, MOUTARDE, GRAINES DE SÉSAME et SOJA.
Wasa Volkoren
whole grain rye flour, yeast, salt,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wasa or Wasa Volkoren?
Overall, Wasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wasa Volkoren has fewer calories: 333 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wasa Volkoren has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.