Wasa vs Sesam
Overall, Wasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wasa | Sesam |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 338 kcal | 392 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 9.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 20 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wasa has 14% fewer calories (338 kcal vs 392 kcal).
- Wasa has 84% less fat (1.5 g vs 9.5 g).
- Wasa has 75% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.2 g).
- Sesam has 50% less sugar (1 g vs 2 g).
- Wasa has 45% more fiber (20 g vs 11 g).
- Sesam has 36% more protein (14 g vs 9 g).
- Only Sesam lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Wasa
Farine complète de SEIGLE 110 g*, sel. *en g pour 100 g de produit. Peut contenir des traces de LUPIN, LAIT, MOUTARDE, GRAINES DE SÉSAME et SOJA.
Sesam
farine complète de blé 49%, farine de blé 40%, graines de sésame 9,3%, levure, huile de tournesol, sucre, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wasa or Sesam?
Overall, Wasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wasa has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sesam has less sugar: 1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.