Comparison

Tartine craquantes vs Wasa

Overall, Wasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTartine craquantesWasa
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 447 kcal 338 kcal
Fat 19 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 2.1 g 2 g
Salt 1.8 g 1 g
Fiber 12 g 20 g
Protein 14 g 9 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Sesame seedsGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wasa has 24% fewer calories (338 kcal vs 447 kcal).
  • Wasa has 92% less fat (1.5 g vs 19 g).
  • Wasa has 86% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Wasa has 44% less salt (1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Wasa has 40% more fiber (20 g vs 12 g).
  • Tartine craquantes has 36% more protein (14 g vs 9 g).
  • Wasa has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Tartine craquantes lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Tartine craquantes

Farine complète de blé 70%, flocons d'avoine" 9 %, graines de lin", graines de tourneso!", huile de tournesol", graines de chia" 5%, sel de mer, graines de sésame , levure, extrait de malt d'orge.

Wasa

Farine complète de SEIGLE 110 g*, sel. *en g pour 100 g de produit. Peut contenir des traces de LUPIN, LAIT, MOUTARDE, GRAINES DE SÉSAME et SOJA.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tartine craquantes or Wasa?

Overall, Wasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wasa has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 447 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wasa has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons