Tarama premium vs Tarama degustation
Overall, Tarama degustation has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Tarama premium
Tarama degustation
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tarama premium | Tarama degustation |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 568 kcal | 504 kcal |
| Fat | 59.7 g | 51 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tarama degustation has 11% fewer calories (504 kcal vs 568 kcal).
- Tarama degustation has 15% less fat (51 g vs 59.7 g).
- Tarama degustation has 42% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.8 g).
- Tarama degustation has 19% more protein (9 g vs 7.3 g).
- Tarama degustation has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tarama degustation lists: Fish, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Tarama premium
Not available.
Tarama degustation
Huile de colza ; œufs de cabillaud fumés et salés 40% (œufs de cabillaud 38%, sel) ; eau ; jus de citron concentré 1,1 % (dont sulfites) ; chapelure (farine de blé, levure, sel) ; sucre ; conservateurs : E262, E202, E211 ; colorant : E120.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tarama premium or Tarama degustation?
Overall, Tarama degustation has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tarama degustation has fewer calories: 504 kcal versus 568 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tarama premium has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.