Tarama premium vs Tarama
Overall, Tarama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tarama premium | Tarama |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 568 kcal | 503 kcal |
| Fat | 59.7 g | 51 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tarama has 11% fewer calories (503 kcal vs 568 kcal).
- Tarama has 15% less fat (51 g vs 59.7 g).
- Tarama has 20% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 4.1 g).
- Tarama has 46% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.8 g).
- Tarama has 21% more protein (9.2 g vs 7.3 g).
- Tarama has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tarama lists: Fish, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Tarama premium
Not available.
Tarama
huile de colza, œufs de cabillaud salés et fumés 40% (œufs de cabillaud 38% (Gadus morhua ou Gadus macrocephallus FAO 27 ou FAO 67), sel), eau, jus de citron concentré (contient des sulfites), chapelure (farine de blé, levure, sel), sucre, colorant : carmins, conservateurs: acétates de sodium, benzoate de sodium et sorbate de potassium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tarama premium or Tarama?
Overall, Tarama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tarama has fewer calories: 503 kcal versus 568 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tarama premium has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.