Tarama nature - 250g vs Tarama
Overall, Tarama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tarama nature - 250g | Tarama |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 565 kcal | 503 kcal |
| Fat | 58 g | 51 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tarama has 11% fewer calories (503 kcal vs 565 kcal).
- Tarama has 12% less fat (51 g vs 58 g).
- Tarama has 20% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 4.1 g).
- Tarama nature - 250g has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Tarama nature - 250g has 48% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tarama has 49% more protein (9.2 g vs 4.7 g).
- Tarama nature - 250g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Tarama lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Tarama nature - 250g
Huile de colza, œufs de cabillaud fumés 26% (dont poissons) (œufs de cabillaud 25%, sel, sucre fermenté), eau, chapelure (farine de blé, eau, sel, levure), concentré de jus de citron, ingrédients colorants : concentré de patate douce et concentré de carotte pourpre ; ; concentré de jus de pomme, régulateur d'acidité : E330, acidifiant : E270, conservateur : E202. Peut contenir : crustacés, oeufs, soja, lait, moutarde, graines de sésame et mollusques.% exprimés sur le produit fini
Tarama
huile de colza, œufs de cabillaud salés et fumés 40% (œufs de cabillaud 38% (Gadus morhua ou Gadus macrocephallus FAO 27 ou FAO 67), sel), eau, jus de citron concentré (contient des sulfites), chapelure (farine de blé, levure, sel), sucre, colorant : carmins, conservateurs: acétates de sodium, benzoate de sodium et sorbate de potassium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tarama nature - 250g or Tarama?
Overall, Tarama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tarama has fewer calories: 503 kcal versus 565 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tarama nature - 250g has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.