Sweet Thins Honey Cinnamon vs Lait de coco
Overall, Lait de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet Thins Honey Cinnamon | Lait de coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 467 kcal | 162 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 16.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 11.7 g | 15.5 g |
| Sugars | 23.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 5.1 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lait de coco has 65% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 467 kcal).
- Lait de coco has 18% less fat (16.3 g vs 20 g).
- Sweet Thins Honey Cinnamon has 25% less saturated fat (11.7 g vs 15.5 g).
- Lait de coco has 92% less sugar (1.8 g vs 23.3 g).
- Lait de coco has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Lait de coco has 35% more fiber (5.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Sweet Thins Honey Cinnamon has 76% more protein (6.7 g vs 1.6 g).
- Lait de coco has the better Nutri-Score.
- Lait de coco is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sweet Thins Honey Cinnamon lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Sweet Thins Honey Cinnamon
Seed and Nut Flour Blend (watermelon, cashew, sunflower, flax), Tapioca Starch, Arrowroot, Coconut Sugar, Organic Coconut Oil, Honey, Honey Extract, Organic Cinnamon, Baking Soda, Rosemary Extract, Sea Salt, Cream of Tartar, Vanilla Extract
Lait de coco
extrait de noix de coco 57%, eau
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet Thins Honey Cinnamon or Lait de coco?
Overall, Lait de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lait de coco has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 467 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lait de coco has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 23.3 g per 100 g.