Comparison

Mix Frutos Secos Y Arandanos vs Lait de coco

Overall, Lait de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMix Frutos Secos Y ArandanosLait de coco
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 573 kcal 162 kcal
Fat 42.6 g 16.3 g
Saturated fat 4.2 g 15.5 g
Sugars 21.8 g 1.8 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 7.3 g 5.1 g
Protein 15.8 g 1.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNuts, PeanutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lait de coco has 72% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 573 kcal).
  • Lait de coco has 62% less fat (16.3 g vs 42.6 g).
  • Mix Frutos Secos Y Arandanos has 73% less saturated fat (4.2 g vs 15.5 g).
  • Lait de coco has 92% less sugar (1.8 g vs 21.8 g).
  • Mix Frutos Secos Y Arandanos has 30% more fiber (7.3 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Mix Frutos Secos Y Arandanos has 90% more protein (15.8 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Lait de coco has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Lait de coco is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Mix Frutos Secos Y Arandanos lists: Nuts, Peanuts.

Ingredients

Mix Frutos Secos Y Arandanos

43,4% Mandeln, 25% Cranberries getrocknet und gezuckert (60% Cranberries 39% Zucker, Sonnenblumenöl), 15% Haselnusskerne, 9,7% Cashewkerne, 5% Pecannusskerne, Sonnenblumenöl. Kann Spuren vor anderen Schalenfrüchten (Baumnüssen, Paranüssen, Pistazien, Macadamianüssen) und Erdnüssen enthalten.

Lait de coco

extrait de noix de coco 57%, eau

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mix Frutos Secos Y Arandanos or Lait de coco?

Overall, Lait de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lait de coco has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 573 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lait de coco has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 21.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons