Comparison

SWEET POTATO crackers vs Craquelins de riz

Overall, Craquelins de riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSWEET POTATO crackersCraquelins de riz
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 500 kcal 433 kcal
Fat 26.7 g 8.3 g
Saturated fat 3.3 g 1 g
Sugars 6.7 g 0 g
Salt 0.5 g 1.3 g
Fiber 6.7 g 0 g
Protein 6.7 g 10 g
Additives00
AllergensSesame seedsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Craquelins de riz has 13% fewer calories (433 kcal vs 500 kcal).
  • Craquelins de riz has 69% less fat (8.3 g vs 26.7 g).
  • Craquelins de riz has 70% less saturated fat (1 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Craquelins de riz has no sugar, while SWEET POTATO crackers has 6.7 g.
  • SWEET POTATO crackers has 63% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • SWEET POTATO crackers has 100% more fiber (6.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Craquelins de riz has 33% more protein (10 g vs 6.7 g).
  • SWEET POTATO crackers has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only SWEET POTATO crackers lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

SWEET POTATO crackers

STONE GROUND YELLOW CORN, SUNFLOWER OIL, SWEET POTATO POWDER (11%), STONE GROUND WHITE CORN, BROWN FLAXSEED (2%), BLACK SESAME SEEDS (2%), CHIA SEEDS (1%), SEA SALT.

Craquelins de riz

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: SWEET POTATO crackers or Craquelins de riz?

Overall, Craquelins de riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Craquelins de riz has fewer calories: 433 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Craquelins de riz has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons