Comparison

Sunflower seeds roasted and salted vs Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel

Overall, Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSunflower seeds roasted and...Kaskaras Pipas de girasol co...
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 619 kcal 600 kcal
Fat 56 g 48 g
Saturated fat 9.4 g 5.8 g
Sugars 2.7 g 2.2 g
Salt 1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 18 g —
Protein 1 g 33 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedCelery, Milk, Mustard, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 14% less fat (48 g vs 56 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 38% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 19% less sugar (2.2 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 80% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 97% more protein (33 g vs 1 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel lists: Celery, Milk, Mustard, Nuts.

Ingredients

Sunflower seeds roasted and salted

Not available.

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel

Graines de tournesol ; sel f rine de riz, exhausteurs de goût (E-621) et contenir des traces decacahuètes eé Pruits à coque : noix de cajou, amandes et lait et dérivés du laft, moutarde et céleri.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sunflower seeds roasted and salted or Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel?

Overall, Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has fewer calories: 600 kcal versus 619 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons