Comparison

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel vs Pipas girasol tostadas gigantes 0% sal añadida

Overall, Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKaskaras Pipas de girasol co...Pipas girasol tostadas gigan...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 600 kcal 636 kcal
Fat 48 g 53.7 g
Saturated fat 5.8 g 6.8 g
Sugars 2.2 g 4 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber — 8 g
Protein 33 g 28.7 g
Additives10
AllergensCelery, Milk, Mustard, NutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 11% less fat (48 g vs 53.7 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 15% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 45% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 13% more protein (33 g vs 28.7 g).
  • Pipas girasol tostadas gigantes 0% sal añadida has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel lists: Celery, Milk, Mustard, Nuts.

Ingredients

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel

Graines de tournesol ; sel f rine de riz, exhausteurs de goût (E-621) et contenir des traces decacahuètes eé Pruits à coque : noix de cajou, amandes et lait et dérivés du laft, moutarde et céleri.

Pipas girasol tostadas gigantes 0% sal añadida

Roasted sunflower seeds

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel or Pipas girasol tostadas gigantes 0% sal añadida?

Overall, Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has fewer calories: 600 kcal versus 636 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons