Comparison

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel vs Pipas de girasol BBQ

Overall, Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKaskaras Pipas de girasol co...Pipas de girasol BBQ
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 600 kcal 622 kcal
Fat 48 g 51.7 g
Saturated fat 5.8 g 6.5 g
Sugars 2.2 g 3 g
Salt 0.2 g 2.8 g
Fiber — 8.2 g
Protein 33 g 31.5 g
Additives16
AllergensCelery, Milk, Mustard, NutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 11% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 27% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has 93% less salt (0.2 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel lists: Celery, Milk, Mustard, Nuts.

Ingredients

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel

Graines de tournesol ; sel f rine de riz, exhausteurs de goût (E-621) et contenir des traces decacahuètes eé Pruits à coque : noix de cajou, amandes et lait et dérivés du laft, moutarde et céleri.

Pipas de girasol BBQ

Pipas de girasol, sal, azúcar, maltodextrina, aroma, aroma de humo, potenciador del sabor (E621, E627, E631), especias, antioxidante (E341), colorante (E160c), espesante (goma guar).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel or Pipas de girasol BBQ?

Overall, Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has fewer calories: 600 kcal versus 622 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kaskaras Pipas de girasol con sel has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons