Comparison

Special K Protein Original Multi-Grain Touch of Cinnamon vs Vivo Line 0% Azúcar

Overall, Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSpecial K Protein Original M...Vivo Line 0% Azúcar
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 356 kcal 360 kcal
Fat 1.7 g 2.8 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1.3 g
Sugars 15.3 g 1.7 g
Salt 1.3 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 16.9 g 5.8 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Special K Protein Original Multi-Grain Touch of Cinnamon has 40% less fat (1.7 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Special K Protein Original Multi-Grain Touch of Cinnamon has no saturated fat, while Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has 1.3 g.
  • Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has 89% less sugar (1.7 g vs 15.3 g).
  • Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has 38% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Special K Protein Original Multi-Grain Touch of Cinnamon has 66% more protein (16.9 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Special K Protein Original Multi-Grain Touch of Cinnamon lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Special K Protein Original Multi-Grain Touch of Cinnamon

Harina de trigo, arroz, azúcar, proteína de soya aislada, salvado de trigo, canela, saborizante de malta, sal, saborizante natural, BHT para frescura.

Vivo Line 0% Azúcar

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Special K Protein Original Multi-Grain Touch of Cinnamon or Vivo Line 0% Azúcar?

Overall, Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Special K Protein Original Multi-Grain Touch of Cinnamon has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 15.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons