Soft pitted apricots vs Orejones de albaricoque
Overall, Soft pitted apricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soft pitted apricots | Orejones de albaricoque |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 285 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 53 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 4.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soft pitted apricots has 61% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 285 kcal).
- Orejones de albaricoque has 68% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Orejones de albaricoque has no saturated fat, while Soft pitted apricots has 1.1 g.
- Soft pitted apricots has 96% less sugar (2.1 g vs 53 g).
- Soft pitted apricots has 24% more protein (4.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Soft pitted apricots has the better Nutri-Score.
- Orejones de albaricoque is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Soft pitted apricots lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Soft pitted apricots
Partially Rehydrated Dried Apricots, Sulphur Dioxide, Potassium Sorbate
Orejones de albaricoque
100% Albaricoque* seco. * Productos procedentes de la agricultura ecológica
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soft pitted apricots or Orejones de albaricoque?
Overall, Soft pitted apricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soft pitted apricots has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 285 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soft pitted apricots has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 53 g per 100 g.