Comparison

Organic Soft Dried Apricots vs Orejones de albaricoque

Overall, Organic Soft Dried Apricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOrganic Soft Dried ApricotsOrejones de albaricoque
Nutri-Score — d
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 250 kcal 285 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 45 g 53 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 7.5 g 1.7 g
Protein 2.5 g 3.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Organic Soft Dried Apricots has 12% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 285 kcal).
  • Organic Soft Dried Apricots has no fat, while Orejones de albaricoque has 0.5 g.
  • Organic Soft Dried Apricots has 15% less sugar (45 g vs 53 g).
  • Organic Soft Dried Apricots has 77% more fiber (7.5 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Orejones de albaricoque has 26% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.5 g).

Ingredients

Organic Soft Dried Apricots

Organic Apricots, Water

Orejones de albaricoque

100% Albaricoque* seco. * Productos procedentes de la agricultura ecológica

FAQ

Which is healthier: Organic Soft Dried Apricots or Orejones de albaricoque?

Overall, Organic Soft Dried Apricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Organic Soft Dried Apricots has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 285 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Organic Soft Dried Apricots has less sugar: 45 g versus 53 g per 100 g.

More comparisons