Soft Apricots vs Orejones de albaricoque
Overall, Soft Apricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soft Apricots | Orejones de albaricoque |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 229 kcal | 285 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 41.6 g | 53 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soft Apricots has 20% fewer calories (229 kcal vs 285 kcal).
- Soft Apricots has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Soft Apricots has 22% less sugar (41.6 g vs 53 g).
- Soft Apricots has 84% more fiber (10.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- Orejones de albaricoque has 26% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- Soft Apricots has the better Nutri-Score.
- Orejones de albaricoque is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Soft Apricots lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Soft Apricots
Partially rehydrated dried apricots, Preservatives (sulphur dioxide, potassium sorbate), Acidity regulators (citric acid, malic acid).
Orejones de albaricoque
100% Albaricoque* seco. * Productos procedentes de la agricultura ecológica
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soft Apricots or Orejones de albaricoque?
Overall, Soft Apricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soft Apricots has fewer calories: 229 kcal versus 285 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soft Apricots has less sugar: 41.6 g versus 53 g per 100 g.