Chopped apricots vs Orejones de albaricoque
Overall, Chopped apricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chopped apricots | Orejones de albaricoque |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 285 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.7 g | 53 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chopped apricots has 84% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 285 kcal).
- Chopped apricots has 87% less sugar (6.7 g vs 53 g).
- Orejones de albaricoque has 76% more protein (3.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Chopped apricots has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chopped apricots
organic dried chopped pitted apricots
Orejones de albaricoque
100% Albaricoque* seco. * Productos procedentes de la agricultura ecológica
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chopped apricots or Orejones de albaricoque?
Overall, Chopped apricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chopped apricots has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 285 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chopped apricots has less sugar: 6.7 g versus 53 g per 100 g.