Comparison

Chopped apricots vs Orejones de albaricoque

Overall, Chopped apricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChopped apricotsOrejones de albaricoque
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 46 kcal 285 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 6.7 g 53 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.7 g 1.7 g
Protein 0.8 g 3.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chopped apricots has 84% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 285 kcal).
  • Chopped apricots has 87% less sugar (6.7 g vs 53 g).
  • Orejones de albaricoque has 76% more protein (3.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Chopped apricots has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Chopped apricots

organic dried chopped pitted apricots

Orejones de albaricoque

100% Albaricoque* seco. * Productos procedentes de la agricultura ecológica

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chopped apricots or Orejones de albaricoque?

Overall, Chopped apricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chopped apricots has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 285 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chopped apricots has less sugar: 6.7 g versus 53 g per 100 g.

More comparisons