Comparison

Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes vs Rice and Corn Cakes

Overall, Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSnack a Jacks Caramel Rice C...Rice and Corn Cakes
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 387 kcal 410 kcal
Fat 1.7 g 5.7 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 1 g
Sugars 18.8 g 1 g
Salt 0.5 g 1.3 g
Fiber 11.2 g 3.8 g
Protein 6.1 g 8.6 g
Additives41
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes has 70% less fat (1.7 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes has 68% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
  • Rice and Corn Cakes has 95% less sugar (1 g vs 18.8 g).
  • Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes has 63% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes has 66% more fiber (11.2 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Rice and Corn Cakes has 29% more protein (8.6 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Only Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes

wholegrain rice (35%), maize (with germ removed), sugar, caramel flavour [flavourings, colour (sulphite ammonia caramel)], sunflower oil, colour (annatto), emulsifier (soya lecithin), salt

Rice and Corn Cakes

Wholegrain Rice (46%), Maize, Seasoning [Flavourings, Salt, Acid (Citric Acid), Sugar, Potassium Chloride, Vinegar Powder], Sunflower Oil.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes or Rice and Corn Cakes?

Overall, Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Snack a Jacks Caramel Rice Cakes has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 410 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rice and Corn Cakes has less sugar: 1 g versus 18.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons