Sliced Savoy Cabbage vs Chou vert en feuilles
Overall, Sliced Savoy Cabbage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sliced Savoy Cabbage | Chou vert en feuilles |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 34 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sliced Savoy Cabbage has 38% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 34 kcal).
- Sliced Savoy Cabbage has 27% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3 g).
- Chou vert en feuilles has 27% more fiber (3 g vs 2.2 g).
Ingredients
Sliced Savoy Cabbage
Sliced Savoy cabbage.
Chou vert en feuilles
Chou vert
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sliced Savoy Cabbage or Chou vert en feuilles?
Overall, Sliced Savoy Cabbage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sliced Savoy Cabbage has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 34 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sliced Savoy Cabbage has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.