Comparison
Sliced Savoy Cabbage vs Rotkohl
Overall, Sliced Savoy Cabbage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sliced Savoy Cabbage | Rotkohl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 30 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | — |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sliced Savoy Cabbage has 86% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 146 kcal).
- Sliced Savoy Cabbage has 93% less sugar (2.2 g vs 30 g).
Ingredients
Sliced Savoy Cabbage
Sliced Savoy cabbage.
Rotkohl
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sliced Savoy Cabbage or Rotkohl?
Overall, Sliced Savoy Cabbage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sliced Savoy Cabbage has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 146 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sliced Savoy Cabbage has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 30 g per 100 g.