Sliced Cured Ham on the bone vs Poledwica sopocka
Overall, Sliced Cured Ham on the bone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sliced Cured Ham on the bone | Poledwica sopocka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 123 kcal | 97 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 23 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 4 | 3 |
| Allergens | Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poledwica sopocka has 21% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 123 kcal).
- Poledwica sopocka has 21% less fat (2.6 g vs 3.3 g).
- Poledwica sopocka has 23% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Sliced Cured Ham on the bone has 33% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Sliced Cured Ham on the bone has 22% more protein (23 g vs 18 g).
- Sliced Cured Ham on the bone has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sliced Cured Ham on the bone lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Sliced Cured Ham on the bone
Pork, Salt, Stabilisers (Triphosphates, Potassium Phosphates, Polyphosphates), Preservative (Sodium Nitrite)
Poledwica sopocka
Pork Loin (81%), Water, Salt, Stabilisers: Sodium Citrate, Triphosphates; Pork Collagen Protein, Glucose, Antioxidant: Sodium Isoascorbate; Flavouring, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sliced Cured Ham on the bone or Poledwica sopocka?
Overall, Sliced Cured Ham on the bone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poledwica sopocka has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 123 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sliced Cured Ham on the bone has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.