Comparison

Bavarian style ham vs Poledwica sopocka

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBavarian style hamPoledwica sopocka
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 107 kcal 97 kcal
Fat 2.4 g 2.6 g
Saturated fat 1 g 1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.6 g
Salt 2.6 g 2.2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 21 g 18 g
Additives33
AllergensPorkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Poledwica sopocka has 15% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Bavarian style ham has 14% more protein (21 g vs 18 g).
  • Only Bavarian style ham lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Bavarian style ham

Pork*, Iodised Salt [Salt, Preservative (Sodium Nitrite), Potassium Iodate], Smoked Salt, Stabiliser (Diphosphates), Spice Extracts [Lovage, Pepper], Fenugreek, Onion Powder, Garlic Powder, Leek Extract, Antioxidant (Sodium Ascorbate). *Made with 100g of pork per 100g of finished product. May contain celery and mustard.

Poledwica sopocka

Pork Loin (81%), Water, Salt, Stabilisers: Sodium Citrate, Triphosphates; Pork Collagen Protein, Glucose, Antioxidant: Sodium Isoascorbate; Flavouring, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bavarian style ham or Poledwica sopocka?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Poledwica sopocka has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 107 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bavarian style ham has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons