Comparison

Saint Azay vs Bavarian style ham

Overall, Bavarian style ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaint AzayBavarian style ham
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 463 kcal 107 kcal
Fat 36 g 2.4 g
Saturated fat 14 g 1 g
Sugars 2.7 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 2.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 28 g 21 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bavarian style ham has 77% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 463 kcal).
  • Bavarian style ham has 93% less fat (2.4 g vs 36 g).
  • Bavarian style ham has 93% less saturated fat (1 g vs 14 g).
  • Bavarian style ham has 81% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Saint Azay has no salt, while Bavarian style ham has 2.6 g.
  • Saint Azay has 25% more protein (28 g vs 21 g).
  • Only Bavarian style ham lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Saint Azay

Not available.

Bavarian style ham

Pork*, Iodised Salt [Salt, Preservative (Sodium Nitrite), Potassium Iodate], Smoked Salt, Stabiliser (Diphosphates), Spice Extracts [Lovage, Pepper], Fenugreek, Onion Powder, Garlic Powder, Leek Extract, Antioxidant (Sodium Ascorbate). *Made with 100g of pork per 100g of finished product. May contain celery and mustard.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saint Azay or Bavarian style ham?

Overall, Bavarian style ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bavarian style ham has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 463 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bavarian style ham has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons