Saint Azay vs Poledwica sopocka
Overall, Poledwica sopocka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saint Azay | Poledwica sopocka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 463 kcal | 97 kcal |
| Fat | 36 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 28 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poledwica sopocka has 79% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 463 kcal).
- Poledwica sopocka has 93% less fat (2.6 g vs 36 g).
- Poledwica sopocka has 93% less saturated fat (1 g vs 14 g).
- Poledwica sopocka has 78% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.7 g).
- Saint Azay has no salt, while Poledwica sopocka has 2.2 g.
- Saint Azay has 36% more protein (28 g vs 18 g).
Ingredients
Saint Azay
Not available.
Poledwica sopocka
Pork Loin (81%), Water, Salt, Stabilisers: Sodium Citrate, Triphosphates; Pork Collagen Protein, Glucose, Antioxidant: Sodium Isoascorbate; Flavouring, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saint Azay or Poledwica sopocka?
Overall, Poledwica sopocka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poledwica sopocka has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 463 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Poledwica sopocka has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.