Skir vs Activia au bifidus
Overall, Skir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skir | Activia au bifidus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 9.3 g | — |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skir has 29% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Skir has 82% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.8 g).
- Skir has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Activia au bifidus has 88% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4 g).
- Skir has 80% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Skir lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Skir
LAIT écrémé pasteurisé issu de l'agriculture biologique, ferments lactiques sélectionnés (LAIT).
Activia au bifidus
VALEURS NUTRITIONNELLES MOYENNES Energie Matières grasses (g) dont acides gras saturés (g) Glucides (g)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skir or Activia au bifidus?
Overall, Skir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skir has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Activia au bifidus has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4 g per 100 g.