Skyr nature vs Activia au bifidus
Overall, Skyr nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skyr nature | Activia au bifidus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g | — |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skyr nature has 29% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Skyr nature has 82% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.8 g).
- Skyr nature has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Activia au bifidus has 88% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4 g).
- Skyr nature has 80% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Skyr nature lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Skyr nature
lait écrémé pasteurisé biologique, ferments lactiques sélectionnés
Activia au bifidus
VALEURS NUTRITIONNELLES MOYENNES Energie Matières grasses (g) dont acides gras saturés (g) Glucides (g)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skyr nature or Activia au bifidus?
Overall, Skyr nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skyr nature has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Activia au bifidus has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4 g per 100 g.