Comparison
Semola vs Tarwe Griesmeel
Overall, Tarwe Griesmeel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Semola | Tarwe Griesmeel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 347 kcal | 340 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tarwe Griesmeel has 47% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tarwe Griesmeel has no sugar, while Semola has 3 g.
- Tarwe Griesmeel has 59% more fiber (7 g vs 2.9 g).
Ingredients
Semola
Doppelt gemahlener hartweizengrieß
Tarwe Griesmeel
Tarwegriesmeel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Semola or Tarwe Griesmeel?
Overall, Tarwe Griesmeel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tarwe Griesmeel has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 347 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tarwe Griesmeel has less sugar: 0 g versus 3 g per 100 g.