Comparison

Semola vs Boerencake

Overall, Semola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSemolaBoerencake
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 347 kcal 423 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 24.3 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 10.7 g
Sugars 3 g 26.3 g
Salt 0 g 0.9 g
Fiber 2.9 g 0 g
Protein 12 g 5.7 g
Additives04
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Semola has 18% fewer calories (347 kcal vs 423 kcal).
  • Semola has 94% less fat (1.5 g vs 24.3 g).
  • Semola has 97% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Semola has 89% less sugar (3 g vs 26.3 g).
  • Semola has no salt, while Boerencake has 0.9 g.
  • Semola has 100% more fiber (2.9 g vs 0 g).
  • Semola has 53% more protein (12 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Semola has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Semola

Doppelt gemahlener hartweizengrieß

Boerencake

Suiker, TARWEBLOEM, maïsmeel, maiszetmeel, rijstzetmeel, rijsmiddelen (E450, E500), emulgatoren (E471, E475), ROGGEMEEL, zout, aroma's, natuurlijk citroenaroma.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Semola or Boerencake?

Overall, Semola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Semola has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 423 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Semola has less sugar: 3 g versus 26.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons