Comparison

Semmelknödel vs Serviettenknödel

Overall, Semmelknödel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSemmelknödelServiettenknödel
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 141 kcal 193 kcal
Fat 3.7 g 8.1 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 0.9 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2.1 g
Salt 1.1 g 3.2 g
Fiber 1 g —
Protein 3.6 g 5.1 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, GlutenEggs, Gluten, Milk, Hefe, Trockenvollei

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Semmelknödel has 27% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 193 kcal).
  • Semmelknödel has 54% less fat (3.7 g vs 8.1 g).
  • Serviettenknödel has 50% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Semmelknödel has 76% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Semmelknödel has 66% less salt (1.1 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Serviettenknödel has 29% more protein (5.1 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Semmelknödel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Serviettenknödel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Serviettenknödel lists: Milk, Hefe, Trockenvollei.

Ingredients

Semmelknödel

72% Semmelbrot (WEIZENMEHL, Speisesalz, Hefe, Sonnenblumenöl, Paprika), Stärke, Palmöl, WEIZENMEHL, VOLLEIPULVER, HARTWEIZENGRIESS, Speisesalz, Petersilie, Aromen, Hefeextrakt, Curcuma. Kann Spuren von Milch und Sellerie enthalten.

Serviettenknödel

Semmelwürfel (57 %) (_Weizenmehl_, Speisesalz, _Hefe_, Rapsöl, Palmfett), _Weizenmehl_, Palmfett, _Trockenvollei_, _Magermilchpulver_, Speisesalz, Zwiebeln, Petersilie, Gewürz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Semmelknödel or Serviettenknödel?

Overall, Semmelknödel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Semmelknödel has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 193 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Semmelknödel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons